data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7bed/d7bed16ea8ba3bcb79ec8c2190e1bfb6dd393d73" alt=""
So, why don’t dark folks get ‘white ink’ tattoos? That’s my question. The ink does indeed exist and this would seem to make perfect visibility sense. Well James, you idiot, it don’t work like that! Tattoo ink is injected into the dermal layer of the skin, below the epidermal (outermost) layer. Melanin in the epidermal layer blocks the view to the ink deposited into the dermal layer. Artist can use white ink, but it disappears below the pigmented epidermal layer of dark-skinned people. What a dumb ass.
So, stated a different way, the epidermal layer of White, and lighter, folks has a translucent (see through) quality, whereby we can see the ink deposited in the permanent dermal layer. The darker the recipient the darker the ink required to make a clear long-lasting tattoo. For dark-skinned Blacks, white ink is out, also lighter colors too. They don’t show under all that naturally sun-blocking melanin.
So there you have it. Now they do make luminescent ink, but glowing in the dark has yet to catch on – probably something to do with looking radioactive - buzz kill.
James C. Collier
READ MOST RECENT POSTS AT ACTING WHITE...
Technorati Tags: #8 Black and Tattoos, Body Art, Thugs, Skinheads, NBA, Acting White
4 comments:
Burning it in is very visible with the scarring. More painful, too.
yeah white ink doesnt hold in everyones skin. theres no such thing as acting a certain race though :]
See, now I feel stupid (well, more than usual). I was just wondering about that and thought that white ink didn't exist.
June: no worries. I'm ignorant (from above) because I tag based on popular word searches, not political correctness. Keep a head up...
Post a Comment